“My assumption is at least that they looked at the the case they looked at the facts, they looked at the law and they came to conclusion they did and I have a high level of confidence in this court,” Thune said. 2 Senate Republican, said he has confidence in the Supreme Court after Thursday’s decision. The House currently has 222 Republicans and 212 Democrats, and one vacancy. “In other words, today’s ruling appears to repudiate the Court’s interventions in 2022, which may have directly contributed to Republican control of the current House of Representatives,” Vladeck added. “Between those rulings and lower courts following them in other states, that led directly to at least three, and as many as six, seats in the current House controlled by Republicans that might otherwise have been controlled by Democrats – along with the House itself,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. Supreme Court clears way for family of Medicaid recipient to sue state-owned nursing home Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images The high court decided to preserve access to a drug Mifepristone used in the most common method of abortion, rejecting lower-court restrictions while a lawsuit continues. The Supreme Court of the United States on Friday, Apin Washington, DC. “Today’s decision rejects efforts to further erode fundamental voting rights protections, and preserves the principle that in the United States, all eligible voters must be able to exercise their constitutional right to vote free from discrimination based on their race,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement.”Īfter the 2020 census, Alabama enacted a congressional map that included just one Black majority district out of the state’s seven districts despite the fact that Black voters constitute 27% of the state’s population. It means that minority dilution is not going to be tolerated by the Supreme Court or by any court in the land and that is a huge victory,” Sewell added. “Everyone’s looking at this decision and I think that it will have a ripple effect, a positive ripple effect. “I’m so happy that the justices saw the truth in the fact that that represents voter dilution and it’s black voter dilution,” Sewell said on CNN’s “News Central” Thursday. Terri Sewell, the state’s first Black woman elected to Congress, said the Supreme Court’s decision will lead to more “equitable maps” in Alabama. Political impact of court’s rulings in 2022 electionsĪlabama’s Democratic Rep. “A district is not equally open, in other words, when minority voters face – unlike their majority peers – bloc voting along racial lines, arising against the backdrop of substantial racial discrimination within the State, that renders a minority vote unequal to a vote by a nonminority voter. Alabama’s argument “runs headlong into our precedent.” “It simply holds that a faithful application of our precedents and a fair reading of the record before us do not bear them out here,” Roberts said. Roberts wrote Thursday that Section 2 “may impermissibly elevate race in the allocation of political power within the States is, of course, not new,” but he said the opinion “does not diminish or disregard these concerns” he said. It bars voting rules that result in a denial or abridgment of the right to vote on account of racial discrimination. In recent years, Section 2 has been instrumental in paving the way for minority voters to more fully participate in the political process, especially as they combat maps that appear to be neutral but actually entrench racial polarization. The fact that Roberts penned the decision is a surprise given that 10 years ago, the chief justice effectively gutted a separate section of the Voting Rights Act that required states with a history of discrimination to obtain federal approval before changing election laws. “We are content to reject Alabama’s invitation to change existing law,” Roberts said. Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the key parts of the holding, providing the fifth vote. Supporters of voting rights had feared that the court was going to make it harder for minorities to challenge maps under Section 2 of the historic Voting Rights Act.Ĭhief Justice John Roberts penned the opinion for a 5-4 majority, siding with the court’s three liberals. Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in trademark dispute involving a poop-themed dog toy
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |